2025 Rivian R1T

Risk index 48/100 · Moderate risk · Updated 2026-05-05

truck body style silhouette

Illustrative silhouette — not the actual vehicle

Learn more · find one used

Links provided for reader convenience. EV Risk Index earns no referral revenue from these destinations. Silhouette color reflects the vehicle's risk-index band.

Failure index
48/100 (Moderate risk)
Segment
Electric pickup truck
Battery
135 kWh · NMC
Battery supplier
Samsung SDI
Range (WLTP/EPA est.)
676 km
Fast charging
220 kW
Drivetrain
AWD or Quad-Motor (Performance)
Region
North America
5-year degradation (est.)
10%
Known issues
Three open NHTSA campaigns in launch year of Gen-2 platform: HVDB ground connection recall (NHTSA 25V537, August 2025) where improperly grounded electrical connection may cause loss of motive power without warning — affects all 2025 R1T/R1S; Highway Assist (HWA) software defect (NHTSA 25V585, September 2025) covering ~24,214 vehicles where the system may misclassify objects at very low speeds; toe link service-related recall (NHTSA 26V003) for vehicles that received specific service. Plus seat belt D-ring bolt torque issue affecting roughly 500 vehicles.

Editorial assessment

The 2025 Rivian R1T is the launch year of the Gen-2 platform — a substantial mid-cycle re-engineering where Rivian reportedly redesigned roughly 90% of the electrical components and transitioned to in-house drive units. The Gen-2 refresh delivers meaningful range improvements (Tri-Motor up to 420 mi, Max Pack option higher), native NACS port, refreshed RAP1 compute platform, and substantially updated software stack.

Three open NHTSA campaigns affect launch-year vehicles. The High Voltage Distribution Box (HVDB) ground connection recall (NHTSA 25V537, August 2025) addresses a serious potential failure mode — improperly grounded electrical connections may cause loss of motive power without prior warning. The Highway Assist software defect recall (NHTSA 25V585, September 2025) covers approximately 24,214 vehicles where the hands-free system may misclassify objects at very low speeds; the recall was prompted by a customer fender-bender during stop-and-go traffic. The toe link service-related recall (NHTSA 26V003, January 2026) affects vehicles that received specific suspension service using an older procedure.

Editor's take

The 2025 R1T demonstrates a pattern worth naming: major mid-cycle platform refreshes carry launch-year-style recall risk even on otherwise mature vehicles. Rivian's Gen-1 R1T spent three model years accumulating fleet data and software refinement; the Gen-2 reset much of that progress by introducing new electrical architecture, new drive units, and new software. The HVDB ground recall is the most consequential — loss of motive power without warning is the kind of failure mode that defines vehicle reliability. The HWA software recall is a measured response to a software flaw that produced a real-world incident. Buyers should approach the 2025 model year as a launch year, not a refinement year.

Buy, lease, or walk away

Our take

Lease rather than buy

Three open NHTSA campaigns including a hardware-electrical recall on the HV system (with potential battery pack replacement remedy) is sufficient on its own to recommend leasing rather than purchasing. Combined with the substantial Gen-2 platform redesign, the 2025 R1T carries materially higher unresolved-defect risk than mature vehicles in this segment. Lease structure transfers the platform-maturation risk to Rivian during the 36-month period. Buyers who insist on purchasing should verify HVDB recall completion (or — for affected vehicles — battery pack replacement) plus the HWA OTA update completion before purchase.

Price guidance: New 2025 R1T from $69,900 (Dual-Motor Standard Pack). Tri-Motor in the high-$90,000s. Max Pack option adds $7,000-$10,000 across trims.

This is editorial commentary based on depreciation data, warranty timing, and platform risk. Not financial advice — consult a qualified professional for significant purchase decisions.

Active recall campaigns

The following recall campaigns affect or have affected vehicles matching this make and model. Always verify with the regulator using your VIN.

Rivian R1T front seatbelt recall

2022–2023 · Safety restraint

Recall campaign codes on file for this vehicle

Manufacturer campaign code plus the NHTSA campaign number for every recall we have on file for this year and model. Always cross-check by VIN — open recalls vary between specific vehicles within the same model year.

Mfr. code NHTSA # Year Description
FSAM-1723 25V537 2025 HVDB improper ground connection — loss of motive power without warning. Repair or HV battery pack replacement.
FSAM-1744 25V585 2025 Highway Assist (HWA) software defect — system may misclassify objects at low speeds. OTA fix.
FSAM-1814 26V003 2026 Toe link service-related recall — potential joint separation if vehicle received specific suspension service before procedure update.

Verify by VIN with the regulator in your region:

Codes are updated at each content refresh; new campaigns may have been opened since the last update. Regulators outside of NHTSA typically use a vehicle-registration or VIN search flow rather than a per-model URL.

Help other owners — file with the regulator early

Regulatory complaints to NHTSA, Transport Canada, DVSA, and other authorities feed national defect databases. Each report contributes to pattern detection that can trigger formal investigations and recalls — protecting other owners of the same vehicle, not just you.

You can file a regulatory complaint at any time, even before contacting your manufacturer or dealer. The regulatory complaint is a separate channel that helps every owner of your vehicle.

File a regulatory complaint →

Rivian risk scores over time

Every Rivian vehicle we rate, plotted by model year. Lower scores indicate lower reliability risk.

  • This vehicle — the 2025 R1T you're viewing
  • Low risk — failure index 0–30
  • Moderate risk — failure index 31–60
  • High risk — failure index 61–100

Data points: 2022 R1T: 45, 2022 EDV: 55, 2023 R1T: 50, 2023 EDV: 48, 2024 R1S: 45, 2024 R1T: 47, 2024 EDV: 45, 2025 R1T: 48, 2025 EDV: 48, 2026 R2: 40, 2026 R1T: 42, 2027 R2: 45, 2027 R1T: 38.

What the score means

A failure index of 48/100 places this vehicle in our moderate risk band. Vehicles in this band have one or two concerning factors, typically a less-mature platform, a mid-tier battery supplier, or limited recall history. Suitable for buyers comfortable with average ownership costs.

See our full six-factor methodology for how this score is calculated.

Verify with your regulator

The regulator in your jurisdiction is always the authoritative source for whether your specific VIN is affected by an open safety campaign. Check the database below using your vehicle identification number.

Before you buy or sign — what to verify

Our risk rating is a category-level assessment based on platform, chemistry, supplier, and documented recall history. It is not an assessment of any specific vehicle you are considering. Individual vehicle condition varies substantially based on factors outside the manufacturer's control — and those owner-side factors often matter more than the platform rating.

Owner behavior matters more than most people realize

Two identical 2025 Rivian R1Ts can be in dramatically different condition at the same odometer reading. The variables that matter most:

  • Driving style. Hard acceleration, aggressive braking, and high-speed cornering accelerate wear on battery cells, suspension components, tires, and brake systems. An owner who regularly uses full regenerative braking without balancing with normal friction braking will wear rotors differently than a smooth driver — and neither is the manufacturer's fault.
  • Charging habits. Routine DC fast-charging to 100% on NMC or NCA battery chemistry accelerates degradation materially. An LFP-equipped variant charged daily to 100% is fine; an NCA Long Range variant charged that way is not. Charging habits over three or four years can make a 20-point difference in effective battery health between otherwise identical vehicles.
  • Climate exposure. Vehicles kept in garages last dramatically longer than those parked outdoors in extreme climates. Salt exposure on coastal routes or heavily salted winter roads accelerates corrosion of undercarriage components regardless of manufacturer.
  • Scheduled maintenance. Manufacturers publish specific inspection requirements — typically every 12-24 months — that are conditions of full warranty coverage. Owners who skip these inspections may have valid warranty claims denied, which is not the manufacturer failing the owner but the reverse.

The pre-purchase inspection checklist

Before buying any used EV — especially one in our Moderate, High, or Critical risk bands — commission a pre-purchase inspection from a qualified EV technician. Not a general mechanic, not the dealer selling the vehicle, not a friend with tools. A technician with documented EV service experience.

The inspection should include at minimum:

  • Battery state-of-health diagnostic scan. Every major EV platform exposes battery SOC and capacity data through the OBD2 port or manufacturer diagnostic tools. A three-year-old vehicle should retain 90%+ of original capacity; a five-year-old should retain 85%+. Substantially worse numbers indicate either platform issues or abuse.
  • Tire condition and wear pattern analysis. Uneven wear indicates alignment issues or aggressive cornering. Mismatched tire brands or sizes across axles indicates the owner cut corners on replacement. Season-inappropriate tires (summer tires year-round, worn-out all-seasons in snow regions) indicate poor upkeep broadly. Tire tread depth and rotation history are among the most reliable diagnostics of overall owner care — a well-maintained vehicle almost always has well-maintained tires.
  • Service record review. Ask for complete service history. Dealer-stamped maintenance logs, software update records, and any warranty claims filed. Gaps in the service history matter. Multiple address changes in the service records may indicate the vehicle traveled between owners faster than typical — worth investigating why.
  • Visual inspection for signs of abuse. Undercarriage damage, curb rash, curb-struck wheels, aftermarket modifications without documentation, and signs of collision repair not disclosed by the seller.
  • Recall campaign completion verification. Run the specific VIN through the regulator databases linked above. Every applicable recall campaign should show "remedy completed" status. If campaigns are outstanding, get them completed before taking possession — campaigns that were not completed by the previous owner may transfer to you as the new registered owner.

Manufacturer maintenance requirements matter for warranty

EV manufacturers typically require specific inspections at defined intervals — often every 12 or 24 months — as a condition of full warranty coverage. These include brake fluid changes, cabin filter replacements, coolant system inspections, tire rotations, and software updates. Owners who neglect these requirements may have warranty claims denied even for issues entirely unrelated to the neglected item.

Check the specific owner's manual for your Rivian R1T to understand what inspections are required and when. A vehicle with a complete documented inspection history is measurably more valuable — and lower risk — than an otherwise identical vehicle without maintenance records. When buying used, verify the service history yourself with the manufacturer's dealer network; don't rely solely on what the seller tells you.

What this rating means, specifically

A high failure index score indicates that the category of vehicle (this model, this year, this platform) carries elevated risk relative to alternatives. It does not mean any specific 2025 Rivian R1T you encounter will fail. Conversely, a low failure index score does not guarantee a specific well-maintained vehicle is risk-free — a neglected low-risk vehicle can easily be worse than a well-maintained high-risk vehicle.

The rating is a starting point for due diligence, not a substitute for it.

This rating is an editorial assessment based on publicly available data and is not a safety rating, reliability guarantee, or buying recommendation. Individual vehicle condition varies substantially based on owner maintenance, driving style, charging habits, and environmental exposure. A high risk score does not predict failure of any specific vehicle, and a low risk score does not guarantee reliability. Always commission a pre-purchase inspection from a qualified EV technician, verify recall completion through the manufacturer and relevant regulator, and review complete service history before any significant purchase decision.