2025 Volvo EX90
Illustrative silhouette — not the actual vehicle
Learn more · find one used
Links provided for reader convenience. EV Risk Index earns no referral revenue from these destinations. Silhouette color reflects the vehicle's risk-index band.
- Failure index
- 58/100 (Moderate risk)
- Segment
- Luxury full-size SUV (3-row)
- Battery
- 111 kWh · NMC
- Battery supplier
- CATL
- Range (WLTP/EPA est.)
- 496 km
- Fast charging
- 250 kW
- Drivetrain
- AWD (Twin Motor / Twin Motor Performance)
- Region
- Global
- 5-year degradation (est.)
- 11%
- Known issues
- Heavily-troubled launch with multiple-year delays attributed to centralized software architecture stabilization (similar to Polestar 3, with which it shares the SPA2 platform). Three open NHTSA campaigns: headlight LPC software bug (25V091) affecting ~2,061 vehicles where headlight shutters close while driving; power-operated tailgate spindle nut detachment (25V550) where dealers replace both drive units and owners are told not to use POT function until repair completed; rearview camera AAOS recall (25V250) shared with the broader Volvo AAOS-based lineup. Vehicle launched missing some advertised features including cross-traffic alert, front automatic braking, and partial lidar functionality — features were promised to be activated via OTA updates.
Editorial assessment
The 2025 Volvo EX90 was Volvo's first dedicated EV on the SPA2 platform — a vehicle that arrived after multiple-year launch delays driven by software stabilization issues, and that shipped initially missing several advertised features (cross-traffic alert, front automatic braking, partial lidar functionality, even Apple CarPlay). Promised features were activated gradually through over-the-air updates. Three open NHTSA campaigns affect the launch year: a headlight LPC software bug where the headlight shutters close while driving (delivered as an OTA software update), a power-operated tailgate spindle nut detachment requiring drive unit replacement (with owners told not to use the POT function until repaired), and the cross-Volvo rearview camera AAOS software recall.
The EX90 shares the SPA2 platform with the Polestar 3 — this is the second cross-brand platform story on this site (alongside the e-TNGA family). Both the EX90 and Polestar 3 launched late, both attributed delays to centralized software stabilization, both shipped with launch-year software defects that have been progressively addressed through OTA. The shared-platform story is real engineering, not marketing.
Editor's take
The EX90 launch demonstrates the maturity gap between hardware engineering and software engineering at legacy luxury manufacturers. The hardware is genuinely premium — the cabin, the lidar sensor, the 250 kW DC charging, the SPA2 platform's structural design. The software shipped underdeveloped, and the gap between the marketing promise and the delivered product became the dominant launch story. Polestar 3 shows the same pattern. The lesson on this index is that buyers shopping the SPA2 platform should expect software to be the primary source of issues for the first 18-24 months of any vehicle — and that pattern is not unique to Volvo.
Buy, lease, or walk away
Our take
Lease rather than buy
First-year SPA2 platform with three open NHTSA campaigns and a documented pattern of feature-delivery-through-OTA-after-launch. The platform itself is sound but the software trajectory is still being defined. Lease structure transfers the platform-maturation risk to Volvo during the 36-month period when the most issues are likely to surface.
Price guidance: New 2025 EX90 from $79,995. Aggressive lease incentives at launch given the feature-completeness gap and software-driven recall load.
This is editorial commentary based on depreciation data, warranty timing, and platform risk. Not financial advice — consult a qualified professional for significant purchase decisions.
Active recall campaigns
The following recall campaigns affect or have affected vehicles matching this make and model. Always verify with the regulator using your VIN.
Volvo EX90 software validation delays
Recall campaign codes on file for this vehicle
Manufacturer campaign code plus the NHTSA campaign number for every recall we have on file for this year and model. Always cross-check by VIN — open recalls vary between specific vehicles within the same model year.
| Mfr. code | NHTSA # | Year | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| VOLVO-25V091 | 25V091 | 2025 | Headlight shutter LPC software bug — shutters close over high/low beams while driving. OTA fix. ~2,061 US vehicles. |
| VOLVO-25V550 | 25V550 | 2025 | Power tailgate spindle nut detachment — tailgate may suddenly drop. Do not use POT function until both drive units replaced. |
| VOLVO-25V250 | 25V250 | 2025 | AAOS rearview camera software defect — FMVSS 111. Cross-Volvo lineup. Class-action pending. |
Verify by VIN with the regulator in your region:
Codes are updated at each content refresh; new campaigns may have been opened since the last update. Regulators outside of NHTSA typically use a vehicle-registration or VIN search flow rather than a per-model URL.
Help other owners — file with the regulator early
Regulatory complaints to NHTSA, Transport Canada, DVSA, and other authorities feed national defect databases. Each report contributes to pattern detection that can trigger formal investigations and recalls — protecting other owners of the same vehicle, not just you.
You can file a regulatory complaint at any time, even before contacting your manufacturer or dealer. The regulatory complaint is a separate channel that helps every owner of your vehicle.
Volvo risk scores over time
Every Volvo vehicle we rate, plotted by model year. Lower scores indicate lower reliability risk.
- This vehicle — the 2025 EX90 you're viewing
- Low risk — failure index 0–30
- Moderate risk — failure index 31–60
- High risk — failure index 61–100
Data points: 2024 EX30: 35, 2024 EX90: 45, 2025 EX30: 60, 2025 EX90: 58, 2026 EX30: 52, 2026 EX90: 50, 2027 EX30: 45, 2027 EX90: 42.
What the score means
A failure index of 58/100 places this vehicle in our moderate risk band. Vehicles in this band have one or two concerning factors, typically a less-mature platform, a mid-tier battery supplier, or limited recall history. Suitable for buyers comfortable with average ownership costs.
See our full six-factor methodology for how this score is calculated.
Verify with your regulator
The regulator in your jurisdiction is always the authoritative source for whether your specific VIN is affected by an open safety campaign. Check the database below using your vehicle identification number.
- United States — NHTSA (US)
- Canada — Transport Canada
- United Kingdom — DVSA
- European Union — EU Safety Gate (RAPEX)
- Germany — KBA
- France — Rappel Conso
Before you buy or sign — what to verify
Our risk rating is a category-level assessment based on platform, chemistry, supplier, and documented recall history. It is not an assessment of any specific vehicle you are considering. Individual vehicle condition varies substantially based on factors outside the manufacturer's control — and those owner-side factors often matter more than the platform rating.
Owner behavior matters more than most people realize
Two identical 2025 Volvo EX90s can be in dramatically different condition at the same odometer reading. The variables that matter most:
- Driving style. Hard acceleration, aggressive braking, and high-speed cornering accelerate wear on battery cells, suspension components, tires, and brake systems. An owner who regularly uses full regenerative braking without balancing with normal friction braking will wear rotors differently than a smooth driver — and neither is the manufacturer's fault.
- Charging habits. Routine DC fast-charging to 100% on NMC or NCA battery chemistry accelerates degradation materially. An LFP-equipped variant charged daily to 100% is fine; an NCA Long Range variant charged that way is not. Charging habits over three or four years can make a 20-point difference in effective battery health between otherwise identical vehicles.
- Climate exposure. Vehicles kept in garages last dramatically longer than those parked outdoors in extreme climates. Salt exposure on coastal routes or heavily salted winter roads accelerates corrosion of undercarriage components regardless of manufacturer.
- Scheduled maintenance. Manufacturers publish specific inspection requirements — typically every 12-24 months — that are conditions of full warranty coverage. Owners who skip these inspections may have valid warranty claims denied, which is not the manufacturer failing the owner but the reverse.
The pre-purchase inspection checklist
Before buying any used EV — especially one in our Moderate, High, or Critical risk bands — commission a pre-purchase inspection from a qualified EV technician. Not a general mechanic, not the dealer selling the vehicle, not a friend with tools. A technician with documented EV service experience.
The inspection should include at minimum:
- Battery state-of-health diagnostic scan. Every major EV platform exposes battery SOC and capacity data through the OBD2 port or manufacturer diagnostic tools. A three-year-old vehicle should retain 90%+ of original capacity; a five-year-old should retain 85%+. Substantially worse numbers indicate either platform issues or abuse.
- Tire condition and wear pattern analysis. Uneven wear indicates alignment issues or aggressive cornering. Mismatched tire brands or sizes across axles indicates the owner cut corners on replacement. Season-inappropriate tires (summer tires year-round, worn-out all-seasons in snow regions) indicate poor upkeep broadly. Tire tread depth and rotation history are among the most reliable diagnostics of overall owner care — a well-maintained vehicle almost always has well-maintained tires.
- Service record review. Ask for complete service history. Dealer-stamped maintenance logs, software update records, and any warranty claims filed. Gaps in the service history matter. Multiple address changes in the service records may indicate the vehicle traveled between owners faster than typical — worth investigating why.
- Visual inspection for signs of abuse. Undercarriage damage, curb rash, curb-struck wheels, aftermarket modifications without documentation, and signs of collision repair not disclosed by the seller.
- Recall campaign completion verification. Run the specific VIN through the regulator databases linked above. Every applicable recall campaign should show "remedy completed" status. If campaigns are outstanding, get them completed before taking possession — campaigns that were not completed by the previous owner may transfer to you as the new registered owner.
Manufacturer maintenance requirements matter for warranty
EV manufacturers typically require specific inspections at defined intervals — often every 12 or 24 months — as a condition of full warranty coverage. These include brake fluid changes, cabin filter replacements, coolant system inspections, tire rotations, and software updates. Owners who neglect these requirements may have warranty claims denied even for issues entirely unrelated to the neglected item.
Check the specific owner's manual for your Volvo EX90 to understand what inspections are required and when. A vehicle with a complete documented inspection history is measurably more valuable — and lower risk — than an otherwise identical vehicle without maintenance records. When buying used, verify the service history yourself with the manufacturer's dealer network; don't rely solely on what the seller tells you.
What this rating means, specifically
A high failure index score indicates that the category of vehicle (this model, this year, this platform) carries elevated risk relative to alternatives. It does not mean any specific 2025 Volvo EX90 you encounter will fail. Conversely, a low failure index score does not guarantee a specific well-maintained vehicle is risk-free — a neglected low-risk vehicle can easily be worse than a well-maintained high-risk vehicle.
The rating is a starting point for due diligence, not a substitute for it.
This rating is an editorial assessment based on publicly available data and is not a safety rating, reliability guarantee, or buying recommendation. Individual vehicle condition varies substantially based on owner maintenance, driving style, charging habits, and environmental exposure. A high risk score does not predict failure of any specific vehicle, and a low risk score does not guarantee reliability. Always commission a pre-purchase inspection from a qualified EV technician, verify recall completion through the manufacturer and relevant regulator, and review complete service history before any significant purchase decision.