2019 Nissan Leaf

Risk index 60/100 · Moderate risk · Updated 2026-04-20

Failure index
60/100 (Moderate risk)
Segment
Hatchback
Battery
40-62 kWh · NMC
Battery supplier
AESC / Envision AESC
Range (WLTP/EPA est.)
346 km
Fast charging
100 kW
Drivetrain
FWD
Region
Global
5-year degradation (est.)
11%
Known issues
62 kWh Plus/e+ variant introduced alongside 40 kWh base; Rapidgate software mitigation released July 2019; NHTSA 24V-700 / Nissan R24B2 fire risk recall (Smyrna-built CHAdeMO, Aug 29 2018 - Nov 3 2020); NHTSA 23V-494 cruise control recall; R23D7 rearview camera harness

Editorial assessment

The 2019 Leaf introduces the 62 kWh Plus variant alongside the continuing 40 kWh base model — the first and only time the Leaf platform offered dual battery options. The 62 kWh pack (branded e+ in European markets, Plus in North America) uses the same AESC NMC 523 chemistry as the 40 kWh pack but with 48 additional cells and a redesigned module architecture. EPA range for the 62 kWh reaches 215 miles; 40 kWh continues at 149-151 miles. Critically, both packs retain the Leaf's passive air cooling architecture — the Rapidgate concern extends to the 62 kWh variant, as confirmed by Nextmove's 2019 testing showing charge throttling above 38°C pack temperature.

2019 is the year Nissan released the Rapidgate mitigation software update (Service Bulletin EL19-018 / NTB19-056 in North America). The update allowed higher battery temperatures before throttling kicked in, materially improving usable charge speeds on longer trips without replacing any hardware. This is a dealer-applied fix, not over-the-air, and used-buyers should verify it has been completed.

The defining long-term regulatory story for 2019 is NHTSA 24V-700 / Nissan R24B2, the Level 3 fast-charging battery fire recall filed October 2024. The campaign covers 2019-2020 Leaf vehicles with CHAdeMO port, built at Smyrna between August 29, 2018 and November 3, 2020 — approximately 14,940 MY2019 units. Root cause is excessive lithium deposits within battery cells increasing electrical resistance during fast charging. Interim owner guidance: do not use Level 3 charging until remedy completed.

Editor's take

2019 should have been the platform's breakout year — the 62 kWh pack finally made the Leaf competitive on range with a Chevrolet Bolt or a Model 3, and the Rapidgate software fix addressed the most public technical embarrassment. Instead, the five-year regulatory arc ending in the 2024 fire recall has repositioned 2019 as a year used-market buyers approach with care. The fire risk recall is genuinely narrow (Nissan estimates approximately 1 percent of recall-population vehicles have the defect), but the interim remedy — do not fast charge — strips the vehicle of one of its core value propositions until the software update is actually deployed. For buyers willing to accept the constraint while awaiting the fix, 2019 remains a defensible used purchase at the right price.

Buy, lease, or walk away

Our take

Buy used with caution

The 2019 Leaf is a fundamentally good vehicle carrying fundamentally important due-diligence requirements. Required verifications: NHTSA 24V-700 fire risk recall status (software remedy must be installed before Level 3 fast charging can resume safely); 2019 Rapidgate software update (EL19-018 / NTB19-056) applied; NHTSA 23V-494 cruise control software update completion; battery state-of-health scan to establish baseline. VIN-level check via NHTSA.gov recall lookup is essential — the fire recall affects Smyrna-built vehicles in a specific date range.

Strong preference for 62 kWh Plus over 40 kWh for buyers planning any long-distance use. Independent pre-purchase inspection with battery state-of-health scan mandatory at this price tier and risk level.

Price guidance: 62 kWh Plus target $13,500-$18,500 with all recalls remedied and healthy SoH. 40 kWh base $10,500-$14,500. Walk away above $21,000 — 2022 post-recall-scope Leaf becomes competitive at that level.

This is editorial commentary based on depreciation data, warranty timing, and platform risk. Not financial advice — consult a qualified professional for significant purchase decisions.

Worldwide regulatory status

Cross-jurisdictional defect tracking for this model year. This table summarizes publicly filed safety campaigns across regulators. Always verify your specific VIN against the regulator database for your jurisdiction — the summaries below do not substitute for official VIN lookup.

High-voltage battery fire risk during Level 3 (CHAdeMO) fast charging

Status
US-only (Smyrna plant scope); Canadian and European equivalents not yet filed as of our rating period
Scope
Smyrna-built 2019-2020 Leaf with CHAdeMO Level 3 port, built August 29, 2018 - November 3, 2020
Manufacturer code
R24B2
Units affected (global)
23,887

Authorities: USA (NHTSA: 24V-700)

Trigger: Excessive lithium deposits within battery cells increase electrical resistance during Level 3 charging; combined with passive air cooling, pack can overheat and progress to thermal incident

Failure mode: Battery overheating during CHAdeMO fast charging; risk of fire. Warning signs include interrupted charging, unusual noise, burning smell, or smoke from pack

Remedy: Software update to prevent progression to thermal incident. Until remedy is installed, Nissan instructs owners not to use Level 3 charging. Remedy was still rolling out as of late 2024 - early 2025

Cruise control unintended acceleration (software)

Status
US-only
Scope
All 2018-2023 Leaf built September 29, 2017 - March 15, 2023
Manufacturer code
R23A6
Units affected (global)
66,159

Authorities: USA (NHTSA: 23V-494)

Trigger: Vehicle control module software defect affecting mode change within 8 seconds of cruise control disengagement

Failure mode: Vehicle may continue accelerating without driver input until brake applied

Remedy: Vehicle control module software reprogram at authorized Nissan dealer

Rearview camera wiring harness damage

Status
US + Canada
Scope
Certain 2018-2020 Leaf production
Manufacturer code
R23D7

Authorities: USA (NHTSA: R23D7) · Canada (Transport Canada: 2024 equivalent campaign)

Trigger: Rearview camera wiring harness damaged by movement and vibration

Failure mode: Rearview camera image fails to display, FMVSS 111 non-compliance

Remedy: Inspect and replace harness, or reroute with protective tape

Nissan risk scores over time

Every Nissan vehicle we rate, plotted by model year. Lower scores indicate lower reliability risk.

  • This vehicle — the 2019 Leaf you're viewing
  • Low risk — failure index 0–30
  • Moderate risk — failure index 31–60
  • High risk — failure index 61–100

Data points: 2011 Leaf: 85, 2012 Leaf: 82, 2013 Leaf: 75, 2014 Leaf: 70, 2015 Leaf: 68, 2016 Leaf: 60, 2017 Leaf: 58, 2018 Leaf: 55, 2019 Leaf: 60, 2020 Leaf: 62, 2021 Leaf: 60, 2022 Leaf: 55, 2023 Ariya: 50, 2023 Leaf: 48, 2024 Leaf: 45, 2025 Leaf: 48, 2026 Leaf: 40.

What the score means

A failure index of 60/100 places this vehicle in our moderate risk band. Vehicles in this band have one or two concerning factors, typically a less-mature platform, a mid-tier battery supplier, or limited recall history. Suitable for buyers comfortable with average ownership costs.

See our full six-factor methodology for how this score is calculated.

Verify with your regulator

The regulator in your jurisdiction is always the authoritative source for whether your specific VIN is affected by an open safety campaign. Check the database below using your vehicle identification number.

Before you buy or sign — what to verify

Our risk rating is a category-level assessment based on platform, chemistry, supplier, and documented recall history. It is not an assessment of any specific vehicle you are considering. Individual vehicle condition varies substantially based on factors outside the manufacturer's control — and those owner-side factors often matter more than the platform rating.

Owner behavior matters more than most people realize

Two identical 2019 Nissan Leafs can be in dramatically different condition at the same odometer reading. The variables that matter most:

  • Driving style. Hard acceleration, aggressive braking, and high-speed cornering accelerate wear on battery cells, suspension components, tires, and brake systems. An owner who regularly uses full regenerative braking without balancing with normal friction braking will wear rotors differently than a smooth driver — and neither is the manufacturer's fault.
  • Charging habits. Routine DC fast-charging to 100% on NMC or NCA battery chemistry accelerates degradation materially. An LFP-equipped variant charged daily to 100% is fine; an NCA Long Range variant charged that way is not. Charging habits over three or four years can make a 20-point difference in effective battery health between otherwise identical vehicles.
  • Climate exposure. Vehicles kept in garages last dramatically longer than those parked outdoors in extreme climates. Salt exposure on coastal routes or heavily salted winter roads accelerates corrosion of undercarriage components regardless of manufacturer.
  • Scheduled maintenance. Manufacturers publish specific inspection requirements — typically every 12-24 months — that are conditions of full warranty coverage. Owners who skip these inspections may have valid warranty claims denied, which is not the manufacturer failing the owner but the reverse.

The pre-purchase inspection checklist

Before buying any used EV — especially one in our Moderate, High, or Critical risk bands — commission a pre-purchase inspection from a qualified EV technician. Not a general mechanic, not the dealer selling the vehicle, not a friend with tools. A technician with documented EV service experience.

The inspection should include at minimum:

  • Battery state-of-health diagnostic scan. Every major EV platform exposes battery SOC and capacity data through the OBD2 port or manufacturer diagnostic tools. A three-year-old vehicle should retain 90%+ of original capacity; a five-year-old should retain 85%+. Substantially worse numbers indicate either platform issues or abuse.
  • Tire condition and wear pattern analysis. Uneven wear indicates alignment issues or aggressive cornering. Mismatched tire brands or sizes across axles indicates the owner cut corners on replacement. Season-inappropriate tires (summer tires year-round, worn-out all-seasons in snow regions) indicate poor upkeep broadly. Tire tread depth and rotation history are among the most reliable diagnostics of overall owner care — a well-maintained vehicle almost always has well-maintained tires.
  • Service record review. Ask for complete service history. Dealer-stamped maintenance logs, software update records, and any warranty claims filed. Gaps in the service history matter. Multiple address changes in the service records may indicate the vehicle traveled between owners faster than typical — worth investigating why.
  • Visual inspection for signs of abuse. Undercarriage damage, curb rash, curb-struck wheels, aftermarket modifications without documentation, and signs of collision repair not disclosed by the seller.
  • Recall campaign completion verification. Run the specific VIN through the regulator databases linked above. Every applicable recall campaign should show "remedy completed" status. If campaigns are outstanding, get them completed before taking possession — campaigns that were not completed by the previous owner may transfer to you as the new registered owner.

Manufacturer maintenance requirements matter for warranty

EV manufacturers typically require specific inspections at defined intervals — often every 12 or 24 months — as a condition of full warranty coverage. These include brake fluid changes, cabin filter replacements, coolant system inspections, tire rotations, and software updates. Owners who neglect these requirements may have warranty claims denied even for issues entirely unrelated to the neglected item.

Check the specific owner's manual for your Nissan Leaf to understand what inspections are required and when. A vehicle with a complete documented inspection history is measurably more valuable — and lower risk — than an otherwise identical vehicle without maintenance records. When buying used, verify the service history yourself with the manufacturer's dealer network; don't rely solely on what the seller tells you.

What this rating means, specifically

A high failure index score indicates that the category of vehicle (this model, this year, this platform) carries elevated risk relative to alternatives. It does not mean any specific 2019 Nissan Leaf you encounter will fail. Conversely, a low failure index score does not guarantee a specific well-maintained vehicle is risk-free — a neglected low-risk vehicle can easily be worse than a well-maintained high-risk vehicle.

The rating is a starting point for due diligence, not a substitute for it.

This rating is an editorial assessment based on publicly available data and is not a safety rating, reliability guarantee, or buying recommendation. Individual vehicle condition varies substantially based on owner maintenance, driving style, charging habits, and environmental exposure. A high risk score does not predict failure of any specific vehicle, and a low risk score does not guarantee reliability. Always commission a pre-purchase inspection from a qualified EV technician, verify recall completion through the manufacturer and relevant regulator, and review complete service history before any significant purchase decision.