2021 Nissan Leaf

Risk index 60/100 · Moderate risk · Updated 2026-04-20

Failure index
60/100 (Moderate risk)
Segment
Hatchback
Battery
40-62 kWh · NMC
Battery supplier
Envision AESC
Range (WLTP/EPA est.)
346 km
Fast charging
100 kW
Drivetrain
FWD
Region
Global
5-year degradation (est.)
10%
Known issues
NHTSA 25V-655 / Nissan R25C8 fire risk recall (expansion of 24V-700; Smyrna-built CHAdeMO, Nov 3 2020 - May 23 2022); remedy expected late March 2026; NHTSA 23V-494 cruise control recall

Editorial assessment

The 2021 Leaf continues ZE1 production essentially unchanged from 2020. 40 kWh and 62 kWh Plus variants continue; AESC NMC 523 chemistry unchanged; passive air cooling unchanged; CHAdeMO port unchanged. No meaningful specification changes or trim updates were introduced for the model year. Smyrna and Sunderland assembly continued at pandemic-recovery production levels.

For regulatory exposure, the 2021 model year marks the beginning of the expanded fire risk recall scope. NHTSA 25V-655 / Nissan R25C8 was filed October 2025 covering 2021-2022 Leaf with CHAdeMO built at Smyrna between November 3, 2020 and May 23, 2022 — approximately 19,077 units. This campaign explicitly extends the earlier 24V-700 / R24B2 scope, acknowledging that the initial software remedy did not fully prevent the defect from recurring in later production. Root cause identical: excessive lithium deposits in battery cells increasing electrical resistance during Level 3 charging. Remedy is expected to become available in late March 2026, with interim guidance to avoid Level 3 charging. The cruise control unintended acceleration recall (23V-494) also covers all 2021 production.

Editor's take

2021 is the quiet middle year of Gen 2 production that turned out not to be quiet at all. Nothing about the 2021 Leaf is obviously different from the 2020 or 2022 that bracket it — same chassis, same batteries, same trim options, same software. What distinguishes 2021 is that it sits squarely in the expanded fire recall scope added by the October 2025 25V-655 campaign. Prospective buyers in 2026 face a particular timing problem with this year: the remedy is not yet deployed, the interim guidance to avoid Level 3 charging is actively in force, and the vehicle's primary use case for road-trip practicality is therefore on hold until spring 2026 at earliest. For buyers whose charging pattern is exclusively home Level 2, this is a zero-impact constraint. For buyers who need fast charging, it's a genuine near-term limitation.

Buy, lease, or walk away

Our take

Buy used with caution

The 2021 Leaf is in active recall remedy development as of our rating period. Required verifications: NHTSA 25V-655 fire risk recall status at VIN level (Smyrna-built with CHAdeMO, built through May 23, 2022 is in scope); awareness that software remedy is not expected until late March 2026; NHTSA 23V-494 cruise control software update completion; full service and recall history.

For buyers with home Level 2 charging and no DC fast charging need, the 2021 Leaf is usable today with the interim guidance followed. For buyers relying on CHAdeMO fast charging, delay purchase until the 25V-655 remedy is widely deployed. Independent pre-purchase inspection with battery state-of-health scan essential.

Price guidance: 62 kWh Plus target $15,500-$21,000 with recall tracking active. 40 kWh base $12,000-$16,500. Walk away above $24,000 — 2022 post-recall-scope vehicles (post-May 23, 2022 builds) carry less regulatory overhang at similar pricing.

This is editorial commentary based on depreciation data, warranty timing, and platform risk. Not financial advice — consult a qualified professional for significant purchase decisions.

Worldwide regulatory status

Cross-jurisdictional defect tracking for this model year. This table summarizes publicly filed safety campaigns across regulators. Always verify your specific VIN against the regulator database for your jurisdiction — the summaries below do not substitute for official VIN lookup.

High-voltage battery fire risk during Level 3 (CHAdeMO) fast charging (expanded scope)

Status
US-only; remedy in active development
Scope
Smyrna-built 2021-2022 Leaf with CHAdeMO port, built November 3, 2020 - May 23, 2022
Manufacturer code
R25C8
Units affected (global)
19,077

Authorities: USA (NHTSA: 25V-655)

Trigger: Excessive lithium deposits within battery cells increase electrical resistance during Level 3 charging; this campaign expanded 24V-700 / R24B2 scope after original remedy did not fully prevent defect recurrence in later production

Failure mode: Battery overheating during CHAdeMO fast charging with fire risk

Remedy: Software update expected late March 2026; interim guidance is to avoid Level 3 charging until remedy becomes available

Cruise control unintended acceleration (software)

Status
US-only
Scope
All 2018-2023 Leaf
Manufacturer code
R23A6
Units affected (global)
66,159

Authorities: USA (NHTSA: 23V-494)

Trigger: VCM software defect on mode change within 8 seconds of cruise disengagement

Failure mode: Unintended vehicle acceleration

Remedy: VCM software reprogram at authorized dealer

Nissan risk scores over time

Every Nissan vehicle we rate, plotted by model year. Lower scores indicate lower reliability risk.

  • This vehicle — the 2021 Leaf you're viewing
  • Low risk — failure index 0–30
  • Moderate risk — failure index 31–60
  • High risk — failure index 61–100

Data points: 2011 Leaf: 85, 2012 Leaf: 82, 2013 Leaf: 75, 2014 Leaf: 70, 2015 Leaf: 68, 2016 Leaf: 60, 2017 Leaf: 58, 2018 Leaf: 55, 2019 Leaf: 60, 2020 Leaf: 62, 2021 Leaf: 60, 2022 Leaf: 55, 2023 Ariya: 50, 2023 Leaf: 48, 2024 Leaf: 45, 2025 Leaf: 48, 2026 Leaf: 40.

What the score means

A failure index of 60/100 places this vehicle in our moderate risk band. Vehicles in this band have one or two concerning factors, typically a less-mature platform, a mid-tier battery supplier, or limited recall history. Suitable for buyers comfortable with average ownership costs.

See our full six-factor methodology for how this score is calculated.

Verify with your regulator

The regulator in your jurisdiction is always the authoritative source for whether your specific VIN is affected by an open safety campaign. Check the database below using your vehicle identification number.

Before you buy or sign — what to verify

Our risk rating is a category-level assessment based on platform, chemistry, supplier, and documented recall history. It is not an assessment of any specific vehicle you are considering. Individual vehicle condition varies substantially based on factors outside the manufacturer's control — and those owner-side factors often matter more than the platform rating.

Owner behavior matters more than most people realize

Two identical 2021 Nissan Leafs can be in dramatically different condition at the same odometer reading. The variables that matter most:

  • Driving style. Hard acceleration, aggressive braking, and high-speed cornering accelerate wear on battery cells, suspension components, tires, and brake systems. An owner who regularly uses full regenerative braking without balancing with normal friction braking will wear rotors differently than a smooth driver — and neither is the manufacturer's fault.
  • Charging habits. Routine DC fast-charging to 100% on NMC or NCA battery chemistry accelerates degradation materially. An LFP-equipped variant charged daily to 100% is fine; an NCA Long Range variant charged that way is not. Charging habits over three or four years can make a 20-point difference in effective battery health between otherwise identical vehicles.
  • Climate exposure. Vehicles kept in garages last dramatically longer than those parked outdoors in extreme climates. Salt exposure on coastal routes or heavily salted winter roads accelerates corrosion of undercarriage components regardless of manufacturer.
  • Scheduled maintenance. Manufacturers publish specific inspection requirements — typically every 12-24 months — that are conditions of full warranty coverage. Owners who skip these inspections may have valid warranty claims denied, which is not the manufacturer failing the owner but the reverse.

The pre-purchase inspection checklist

Before buying any used EV — especially one in our Moderate, High, or Critical risk bands — commission a pre-purchase inspection from a qualified EV technician. Not a general mechanic, not the dealer selling the vehicle, not a friend with tools. A technician with documented EV service experience.

The inspection should include at minimum:

  • Battery state-of-health diagnostic scan. Every major EV platform exposes battery SOC and capacity data through the OBD2 port or manufacturer diagnostic tools. A three-year-old vehicle should retain 90%+ of original capacity; a five-year-old should retain 85%+. Substantially worse numbers indicate either platform issues or abuse.
  • Tire condition and wear pattern analysis. Uneven wear indicates alignment issues or aggressive cornering. Mismatched tire brands or sizes across axles indicates the owner cut corners on replacement. Season-inappropriate tires (summer tires year-round, worn-out all-seasons in snow regions) indicate poor upkeep broadly. Tire tread depth and rotation history are among the most reliable diagnostics of overall owner care — a well-maintained vehicle almost always has well-maintained tires.
  • Service record review. Ask for complete service history. Dealer-stamped maintenance logs, software update records, and any warranty claims filed. Gaps in the service history matter. Multiple address changes in the service records may indicate the vehicle traveled between owners faster than typical — worth investigating why.
  • Visual inspection for signs of abuse. Undercarriage damage, curb rash, curb-struck wheels, aftermarket modifications without documentation, and signs of collision repair not disclosed by the seller.
  • Recall campaign completion verification. Run the specific VIN through the regulator databases linked above. Every applicable recall campaign should show "remedy completed" status. If campaigns are outstanding, get them completed before taking possession — campaigns that were not completed by the previous owner may transfer to you as the new registered owner.

Manufacturer maintenance requirements matter for warranty

EV manufacturers typically require specific inspections at defined intervals — often every 12 or 24 months — as a condition of full warranty coverage. These include brake fluid changes, cabin filter replacements, coolant system inspections, tire rotations, and software updates. Owners who neglect these requirements may have warranty claims denied even for issues entirely unrelated to the neglected item.

Check the specific owner's manual for your Nissan Leaf to understand what inspections are required and when. A vehicle with a complete documented inspection history is measurably more valuable — and lower risk — than an otherwise identical vehicle without maintenance records. When buying used, verify the service history yourself with the manufacturer's dealer network; don't rely solely on what the seller tells you.

What this rating means, specifically

A high failure index score indicates that the category of vehicle (this model, this year, this platform) carries elevated risk relative to alternatives. It does not mean any specific 2021 Nissan Leaf you encounter will fail. Conversely, a low failure index score does not guarantee a specific well-maintained vehicle is risk-free — a neglected low-risk vehicle can easily be worse than a well-maintained high-risk vehicle.

The rating is a starting point for due diligence, not a substitute for it.

This rating is an editorial assessment based on publicly available data and is not a safety rating, reliability guarantee, or buying recommendation. Individual vehicle condition varies substantially based on owner maintenance, driving style, charging habits, and environmental exposure. A high risk score does not predict failure of any specific vehicle, and a low risk score does not guarantee reliability. Always commission a pre-purchase inspection from a qualified EV technician, verify recall completion through the manufacturer and relevant regulator, and review complete service history before any significant purchase decision.