Software-only remedies are sometimes delivered without an accompanying service record. The recall record requires the campaign reference even when the remedy is delivered over the air; absence of this record creates a documentation gap.
Polestar service performed at Volvo dealerships under service authorization can be classified inconsistently in the resulting paperwork. Written confirmation that the work is recall work, not warranty or paid service, is operationally important for recall closure documentation.
Camera display defects that affect compliance with FMVSS 111 (or regional equivalents) are safety-classified rather than convenience-classified; the regulatory basis affects how the campaign is documented and closed.
OTA-applied remedies may not produce an immediate user-facing notification of the campaign closure. Confirmation through the app or service record, rather than reliance on the OTA install message alone, is the operative documentation.